International Journal of Cardiology
Volume 111, Issue 3 , Pages 442-449, 28 August 2006

Elevated troponin level is not synonymous with myocardial infarction☆☆

  • Nitin Mahajan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 347 277 6497.
  • ,
  • Yatin Mehta

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA
  • ,
  • Malcolm Rose

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA
  • ,
  • Jacob Shani

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA
  • ,
  • Edgar Lichstein

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA

Received 9 May 2005; received in revised form 6 August 2005; accepted 29 August 2005. published online 15 November 2005.

Abstract 

Background

Elevated troponin I in the absence of angiographically visible coronary lesions is seen in up to 10–15% of those undergoing angiography for suspected coronary artery disease. This study aims to elucidate the etiology of elevated cardiac troponin I in patients with normal coronary arteries on angiography.

Methods

We identified 1551 (8.6%) patients with normal coronary arteries from our catheterization database of 17,950 patients from Jan 2000 to Jun 2004. Elevated troponin I levels were found in 217 (14%) of 1551 patients with normal coronary arteries. Of these 217 patients, 73 surgical patients were excluded, and the remaining 144 patients formed the study population. The study population was compared with age and gender matched patients with myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease (Group II).

Results

The patients with elevated cardiac troponin I (cTnI) with normal coronary arteries had significantly lower prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors and significantly higher left ventricular ejection fractions. The cTnI in patients with normal coronary arteries was elevated due to a number of causes including tachycardia, myocarditis, pericarditis, severe aortic stenosis, gastrointestinal bleeding, sepsis, left ventricular hypertrophy, severe congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident, electrical trauma, myocardial contusion, hypertensive emergency, myocardial bridging, pulmonary embolism, diabetic ketoacidosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation and coronary spasm.

Conclusions

Cardiac troponin I could be elevated in a number of conditions, apart from acute myocardial infarction, and could reflect myonecrosis. Acute myocardial infarction is a clinical diagnosis as the laboratory is an aide to, not a replacement for, informed decision making.

Keywords: False-positive, Elevated troponin, Normal coronary arteries, Atherosclerosis, Non-ischemic, Myocardial infarction

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by Maimonides Research Grant.

☆☆ This is the largest series on retrospective analysis of patients with elevated troponin levels. We believe that this study elucidates the etiology and pathophysiology of elevated cardiac troponin I in patients with normal coronary arteries on angiography. Elevated troponins reflect myonecrosis as a result of imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and consumption. Acute myocardial infarction is a clinical diagnosis. Elevated troponin levels should be interpreted appropriately based on underlying clinical setting. This study is a retrospective study, and hence did not involve any patient contact. Also, it had the approval of the Internal Review Board.

PII: S0167-5273(05)01162-9

doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.08.029

International Journal of Cardiology
Volume 111, Issue 3 , Pages 442-449, 28 August 2006