International Journal of Cardiology
Volume 136, Issue 2 , Pages 165-170, 14 August 2009

Effects of intracoronary compared to intravenous abciximab administration in patients undergoing transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: A sub-analysis of the EASY trial

Hôpital Laval, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie, Canada

Received 25 December 2007; received in revised form 5 April 2008; accepted 23 April 2008. published online 28 July 2008.

Abstract 

Background

In the EASY trial, we have shown the clinical equivalence between abciximab bolus-only and abciximab bolus followed by 12-h infusion in a wide spectrum of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Some reports have suggested better outcomes following intracoronary (IC) abciximab administration compared to intravenous (IV) delivery. We sought to compare cardiac biomarkers release and early and late clinical outcomes after IC or IV abciximab bolus delivery.

Methods

From 1005 patients randomized in the EASY trial and undergoing transradial coronary stent implantation, 208 received IC abciximab bolus and 797 received IV abciximab bolus. Route of administration was left to operators' discretion. Creatine Kinase-MB, and Troponin-T (Tn-T) were obtained immediately prior to angiography, 4–6 h after PCI and the next day. MACE (death, MI, TVR) rate was evaluated at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months.

Results

There were more patients with acute coronary syndrome (75% vs 64%, P=0.004) and previous MI (53% vs 42%, P=0.005) in the IC group and more patients with ≥3 dilated sites in the IV group (2% IC vs 7% IV, P=0.03). After PCI, the extent of Tn-T and CK-MB release remained comparable in both groups. The MACE rate was 2% in both groups at 30 days, 9% in IC bolus vs 5% in IV bolus (P=0.04) at 6 months and 10% in IC bolus vs 9% in IV bolus (P=0.50) at 12 months. By multivariate analysis, IC abciximab bolus was not associated with better outcomes at 12 months compared to IV bolus (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.82–1.35, P=0.62).

Conclusion

Compared to IV abciximab administration, IC abciximab was not associated with less cardiac biomarkers release or better clinical outcomes after uncomplicated transradial PCI. Further studies are required in clinical scenarios including patients with higher thrombotic burden and/or occluded vessels as in primary and rescue PCI.

Keywords: Abciximab, Intracoronary, Stent, Platelets, Transradial

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-5273(08)00619-0

doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.04.073

International Journal of Cardiology
Volume 136, Issue 2 , Pages 165-170, 14 August 2009