International Journal of Cardiology
Volume 152, Issue 1 , Pages 43-48, 6 October 2011

First direct comparison of platelet reactivity and thrombolytic status between Japanese and Western volunteers: Possible relationship to the “Japanese paradox”

  • Diana A. Gorog

      Affiliations

    • Imperial College, London, UK
    • Cardiology Department, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Imperial College, London, UK. Tel.: +44 207 034 8934; fax: +44 207 034 8935.
  • ,
  • Junichiro Yamamoto

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Physiology, Kobe Gakuin University, Kobe, Japan
  • ,
  • Smriti Saraf

      Affiliations

    • Cardiology Department, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, UK
  • ,
  • Hiromitsu Ishii

      Affiliations

    • Ishii Hospital, Akashi, Japan
  • ,
  • Yoshinobu Ijiri

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nutrition Management, Faculty of Health Science, Hyogo University, Kakogawa, Japan
  • ,
  • Hideo Ikarugi

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Hyogo, Kobe, Japan
  • ,
  • David M. Wellsted

      Affiliations

    • Health Research and Development Support Unit, University of Hertfordshire, UK
  • ,
  • Mari Mori

      Affiliations

    • Mukogawa Women's University Institute for World Health Development, Nishinomiya, Japan
  • ,
  • Yukio Yamori

      Affiliations

    • Mukogawa Women's University Institute for World Health Development, Nishinomiya, Japan

Received 1 September 2009; received in revised form 5 June 2010; accepted 2 July 2010. published online 16 August 2010.

Abstract 

Objective

To determine and compare thrombotic and endogenous thrombolytic status in Japanese and Western populations.

Background

Incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) and AMI in Japan remains lower than in Western countries. Primary genetic effects are unlikely, given the increased CHD in Japanese migrants. For men, cholesterol and blood pressure have been similar in Japan and the U.S. Dietary factors are implicated, but how these effect CHD is unclear. We postulated that differences in thrombotic and/or thrombolytic status may contribute.

Methods

We measured thrombotic and thrombolytic status in 100 healthy Japanese (J) from Japan and 100 healthy Westerners (W) from the U.K. using the Global Thrombosis Test (GTT). The GTT employs non-anticoagulated blood to create platelet-rich thrombi under high shear (occlusion time OT; seconds), and then measures the restart of blood flow, due to spontaneous thrombolysis (lysis time LT; seconds).

Results

OT was longer in (J) compared to (W) (545 vs. 364, p<0.0001). LT was longer in (J) than in (W) (1753 vs. 1052, p<0.0001). Distribution of LT in (J) did not conform to a normal population, with markedly impaired thrombolytic status (LT>3000s) in 18%, compared to none of the Westerners (p<0.0001).

Conclusions

There are marked differences in thrombotic and thrombolytic status, with (J) having less prothrombotic (longer OT) but less favourable endogenous thrombolytic profile (longer LT). This may be important in the aetiology of thrombotic events. Since platelets and thrombolysis were both inhibited in (J) and yet incidence of AMI is lower, OT would seem more important than LT as a determinant of overall thrombotic risk in this population.

Keywords: Thrombosis, Thrombolysis, Cardiovascular, Race

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-5273(10)00529-2

doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.07.002

International Journal of Cardiology
Volume 152, Issue 1 , Pages 43-48, 6 October 2011