International Journal of Cardiology
Volume 152, Issue 2 , Pages 184-191, 20 October 2011

Does modifying electrode placement of the 12 lead ECG matter in healthy subjects?

  • James P. Sheppard

      Affiliations

    • Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
    • School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • Thomas A. Barker

      Affiliations

    • Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
    • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • Aaron M. Ranasinghe

      Affiliations

    • Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
    • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • Thomas H. Clutton-Brock

      Affiliations

    • Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
    • Department Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Birmingham, UK
  • ,
  • Michael P. Frenneaux

      Affiliations

    • Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
    • Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Birmingham, UK
    • School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, UK
  • ,
  • Michael J. Parkes

      Affiliations

    • Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
    • School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. Tel.: +44 121 414 6977; fax: +44 121 414 4121.

Received 24 February 2010; received in revised form 28 May 2010; accepted 4 July 2010. published online 11 August 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Limb electrodes for the 12 lead ECG are routinely placed on the torso during exercise stress testing or when limbs are clinically inaccessible. It is unclear whether such electrode modification produces ECG changes in healthy male or female subjects that are clinically important according to the 2009 AHA, ACCF, HRS guidelines. We therefore measured whether ECG modification produced clinically important or false positive ECG changes e.g., appearance of Q waves in leads V1–3, ST changes greater than 0.1mV, T wave changes greater than 0.5mV (frontal plane) or 1mV (transverse plane), QRS axis shifts or alterations to QTc/P–R/QRS intervals.

Methods

The 12 lead ECG was measured in 18 healthy and semi-recumbent subjects using the standard and Takuma modified limb placements.

Results

In the frontal plane we demonstrate that the modification of limb electrode placement produces small Q, R and T wave amplitude and QRS axis changes that are statistically but not clinically significant. In the transverse plane it produces no statistically or clinically significant changes in the ECG or in ST segment morphology, P–R, QRS or QTc intervals.

Conclusions

We provide better and more robust evidence that routine modification of limb electrode placement produces only minor changes to the ECG waveform in healthy subjects. These are not clinically significant according to the 2009 guidelines and thus have no effect on the clinical specificity of the 12 lead ECG.

Keywords: Electrocardiogram, Modification, Exercise, T wave, ST segment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This paper presents independent research awarded under NEAT (New and Emerging Applications of Technology), part of the Invention for Innovation (i4i) programme of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

PII: S0167-5273(10)00540-1

doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.07.013

International Journal of Cardiology
Volume 152, Issue 2 , Pages 184-191, 20 October 2011