Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 177, ISSUE 3, P977-981, December 20, 2014

Electrocardiographic identification of prior myocardial infarction during right ventricular pacing — Effect of septal versus apical pacing

  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Stylianos Tzeis
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Henry Dunant Hospital, 107 Mesogion Av., 115 26, Athens, Greece. Tel.: +30 2106972000; fax: +30 2106972200.
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Henry Dunant Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Athens, Greece
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    George Andrikopoulos
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Henry Dunant Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Athens, Greece
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Stefan Asbach
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Heart Centre Freiburg University, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Freiburg, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Verena Semmler
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Abteilung für Elektrophysiologie, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Carsten Lennerz
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Abteilung für Elektrophysiologie, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Ulrich Solzbach
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Ostalbklinikum, Abteilung für Innere Medizin II, Aalen, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Hrvoje Vrazic
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Dubrava University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Axel Kloppe
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Klinikum Lüdenscheid, Abteilung für Innere Medizin III, Lüdenscheid, Germany & Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Medizinische Klinik II, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Norbert Klein
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Abteilung für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Leipzig, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Sokratis Pastromas
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Henry Dunant Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Athens, Greece
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Jürgen Biermann
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Heart Centre Freiburg University, Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Freiburg, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Christof Kolb
    Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
    Affiliations
    Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Abteilung für Elektrophysiologie, Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
    Search for articles by this author
  • on behalf of the SPICE study investigators
  • Author Footnotes
    1 This author takes responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.
Published:October 04, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.187

      Highlights

      • There is lack of evidence on the ECG diagnosis of prior MI during septal pacing.
      • The Cabrera sign is the most useful ECG criterion of prior MI during pacing.
      • Septal pacing does not influence the predictive performance of the Cabrera sign.

      Abstract

      Background

      Electrocardiographic (ECG) identification of prior myocardial infarction (MI) during right ventricular (RV) pacing is of clinical importance. Proposed ECG criteria have been evaluated only during apical pacing. We evaluated the effect of pacing site on the predictive performance of ECG signs of prior MI.

      Methods

      The present study is a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter study which randomized recipients of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator to an apical versus septal RV lead positioning. ECGs of patients with or without prior MI were analyzed for the presence of the following criteria: Cabrera sign, Chapman sign, QR pattern in leads I, aVL, V5 or V6, QR in inferior leads and notching in the descending slope of the QRS complex in inferior leads.

      Results

      The MI group included 89 patients (55.1% apically paced), while 99 patients had no prior MI (50.5% apically paced). In the total population, the Cabrera sign presented the highest specificity (97%) and diagnostic accuracy (62.2%), with a sensitivity of 23.6%. The Cabrera sign was the only significant predictor of a prior MI [OR = 9.9, (95%CI:2.8–34.5), p < 0.001], among all ECG markers. Pacing site did not significantly influence the sensitivity and specificity of the Cabrera sign for detection of prior MI.

      Conclusions

      In our study, the Cabrera sign was the only ECG marker that predicted the presence of prior MI during ventricular paced rhythm. Septal RV lead positioning did not affect the predictive performance of the Cabrera sign.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to International Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Barold S.S.
        • Levine P.A.
        • Ovsyshchert I.E.
        The paced 12-lead electrocardiogram should no longer be neglected in pacemaker follow-up.
        Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001; 24: 1455-1458
        • Burgess D.C.
        • Hunt D.
        • Li L.
        • Zannino D.
        • Williamson E.
        • Davis T.M.
        • et al.
        Incidence and predictors of silent MI in type 2 diabetes and the effect of fenofibrate: an analysis from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study.
        Eur Heart J. 2010; 31: 92-99
        • Toma M.
        • Fu Y.
        • Ezekowitz J.A.
        • McAlister F.A.
        • Westerhout C.M.
        • Granger C.B.
        • et al.
        Does silent MI add prognostic value in ST-elevation MI? Insights from the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute MI (APEX-AMI) trial.
        Am Heart J. 2010; 160: 671-677
        • Davis T.M.
        • Coleman R.L.
        • Holman R.R.
        • UKPDS Group
        Prognostic significance of silent MI in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) 79.
        Circulation. 2013; 127: 980-987
        • Barold S.S.
        • Falkoff M.D.
        • Ong L.S.
        • Heinle R.A.
        Electrocardiographic diagnosis of MI during ventricular pacing.
        Cardiol Clin. 1987; 5: 403-417
        • Cabrera E.
        • Friedland C.
        Wave of ventricular activation in left branch block with infarct; new electrocardiographic sign.
        Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1953; 23: 441-460
        • Chapman M.G.
        • Pearce M.L.
        Electrocardiographic diagnosis of MI in the presence of left bundle-branch block.
        Circulation. 1957; 16: 558-571
        • Barold S.S.
        • Herweg B.
        • Curtis A.B.
        Electrocardiographic diagnosis of MI and ischemia during cardiac pacing.
        Cardiol Clin. 2006; 24: 387-399
        • Kochiadakis G.E.
        • Kaleboubas M.D.
        • Igoumenidis N.E.
        • Skalidis E.I.
        • Simantirakis E.N.
        • Chrysostomakis S.I.
        • et al.
        Electrocardiographic appearance of old MI in paced patients.
        Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002; 25: 1061-1065
        • Theraulaz D.
        • Zimmermann M.
        • Meiltz A.
        • Bloch A.
        Value of the 12-lead resting electrocardiogram for the diagnosis of previous MI in paced patients.
        J Electrocardiol. 2007; 40: 496-503
        • Kindwall K.E.
        • Brown J.P.
        • Josephson M.E.
        Predictive accuracy of criteria for chronic MI in pacing-induced left bundle branch block.
        Am J Cardiol. 1986; 57: 1255-1260
        • Shimony A.
        • Eisenberg M.J.
        • Filion K.B.
        • Amit G.
        Beneficial effects of RV non-apical vs. apical pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
        Europace. 2012; 14: 81-91
        • Kolb C.
        • Tzeis S.
        • Andrikopoulos G.
        • Asbach S.
        • Lemke B.
        • Hansen C.
        • et al.
        Rationale and design of the SPICE study-septal positioning of ventricular ICD electrodes.
        J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011; 31: 247-254
        • Kolb C.
        • Solzbach U.
        • Biermann J.
        • Semmler V.
        • Kloppe A.
        • Klein N.
        • et al.
        Safety of mid-septal electrode placement in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients — results of the SPICE (septal positioning of ventricular ICD electrodes) study.
        Int J Cardiol. 2014; 174: 713-720
        • Thygesen K.
        • Alpert J.S.
        • Jaffe A.S.
        • Simoons M.L.
        • Chaitman B.R.
        • White H.D.
        Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of MI.
        Eur Heart J. 2012; 33: 2551-2567
        • Osmancik P.
        • Stros P.
        • Herman D.
        • Curila K.
        • Petr R.
        The insufficiency of left anterior oblique and the usefulness of right anterior oblique projection for correct localization of a computer tomography-verified right ventricular lead into the midseptum.
        Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6: 719-725
        • Barold S.S.
        Diagnosis of inferior MI based on the paced QRS complex.
        J Electrocardiol. 2007; 40: 161-163