- •HIIT improves peak VO2 and should be considered as a component of care of HFrEF patients.
- •An important caveat is uncertainty and variation of actual training intensities compared to program targets.
- •This review highlights the paucity of high-quality research addressing HIIT versus MICT in HF patients.
Ziaeian B and Fonarow GC. Epidemiology and aetiology of heart failure. 2016; 13: 368.
- Exercise training as therapy for heart failure: current status and future directions.Circ Heart Fail. 2015 Jan; 8: 209-220
- Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in the management of cardiovascular health in individuals with cardiovascular disease (part III).Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2012; 19: 1333-1356
Piepoli MF, Corra` U, Benzer W, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 2010; 17: 1–17.
- Task Force Members. 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.Eur. Heart J. 2016; 37: 2129-2200
- Comparison of different forms of exercise training in patients with cardiac disease: where does high-intensity interval training fit?.Can. J. Cardiol. 2016; 32: 485-494
- High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in the prevention/management of cardiovascular disease.Cardiol. Rev. 2016; 24: 273-281
- Meta-analysis of aerobic interval training on exercise capacity and systolic function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fractions.Am. J. Cardiol. 2013; 15: 111(10)
- High-intensity interval training in cardiac rehabilitation.Sports Med. 2012; 42: 587-605
- Effects of high-intensity interval training on aerobic capacity in cardiac patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Biomed. Res. Int. 2017; 20175420840
- Comparison of cardioprotective benefits of vigorous versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise.Am. J. Cardiol. 2006; 97: 141-147
- The influence of training characteristics on the effect of aerobic exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-regression analysis.Int. J. Cardiol. 2016; 208: 120-127
- High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2017; 24 (2047487317728370): 1696-1707
- High intensity interval training in coronary artery disease patients, is it worth the effort?.Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2017; 24 (2047487317734051): 1692-1695
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.BMJ. 2009; 339b2535
- 2016 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the heart failure association (HFA) of the ESC.Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2016; 18: 891-975
- The cochrane library. Issue 4. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.in: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.6 Update. September 2006
- Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.Phys. Ther. 2008; 88: 156-175
- The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus.J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1998; 51: 1235-1241
- Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating of quality randomized controlled trials.Phys. Ther. 2003; 83: 713-721
- Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range.BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2014; 14135
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.BMJ. 2003; 327: 557-560
- (Accessed 3 Feb 2008)
- High-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous exercise training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study.J. Appl. Physiol. 2015; 119: 753-758
- Comparative effects of high intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training on quality of life in patients with heart failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Clinical Trials and Regulatory Science in Cardiology. 2016; 13: 21-28
Benda NM, Seeger JP, Stevens GG, Hijmans-Kersten BT, van Dijk AP, Bellersen L, et al. Effects of high-intensity interval training versus continuous training on physical fitness, cardiovascular function and quality of life in heart failure patients. PLoS One. 2015;30;10(10):e0141256.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141256.
- Effect of high-intensity interval training versus moderate continuous training on 24-h blood pressure profile and insulin resistance in patients with chronic heart failure.Intern. Emerg. Med. 2014; 9: 547-552
- Low-volume high-intensity interval training vs continuous aerobic cycling in patients with chronic heart failure: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial of feasibility and effectiveness.J. Rehabil. Med. 2014; 46: 348-356
- Cardiac rehabilitation in chronic heart failure: effect of an 8-week, high-intensity interval training versus continuous training.Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2012; 93: 1359-1364
- Physical training as interval or continuous training in chronic heart failure for improving functional capacity, hemodynamics and quality of life—a controlled study [article in German].Z. Kardiol. 2002; 91: 328e337
- High intensity interval training in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Circulation. 2017; 135: 839-849
- Aerobic interval training improves oxygen uptake efficiency by enhancing cerebral and muscular hemodynamics in patients with heart failure.Int. J. Cardiol. 2013; 167: 41-50
- Matched dose interval and continuous exercise training induce similar cardiorespiratory and metabolic adaptations in patients with heart failure.Int. J. Cardiol. 2013; 167: 2561-2565
- A comparison of 16 weeks of continuous vs intermittent exercise training in chronic heart failure patients.Congest. Heart Fail. 2012; 18: 205-211
- Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study.Circulation. 2007; 115: 3086-3094
- The effects of exercise training on the kinetics of oxygen uptake in patients with chronic heart failure.Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 2007; 14: 304-311
- Effects of exercise rehabilitation program on heart rate recovery in patients with chronic heart failure.Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006; 13: 67-73
- Defining the optimal prognostic window for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with heart failure.Circ. Heart Fail. 2010; 3: 405-411
- Prognostic impact of peak VO2-changes in stable CHF on chronic beta-blocker treatment.Int. J. Cardiol. 2007; 122: 125-130
- The influence of training characteristics on the effect of exercise training in patients with coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-regression analysis.Int. J. Cardiol. 2017; 245: 52-58
- Mechanisms of the improvement in peak VO2 with exercise training in heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction.Heart Lung Circ. 2017; 27: 9-21
- Exercise and heart failure: advancing knowledge and improving care.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc. J. 2016; 12: 110-115
- Principles of exercise prescription for patients with chronic heart failure.Heart Fail. Rev. 2008; 13 (Review): 61-68