Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 286, P214-219, July 01, 2019

Download started.

Ok

Is the impact of conventional risk factors the same in men and women? Plea for a more gender-specific approach

  • Renata Cifkova
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Center for Cardiovascular Prevention, Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer Hospitssal, Vídeňská 800, 140 59 Prague 4, Czech Republic.
    Affiliations
    Center for Cardiovascular Prevention, Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

    Department of Medicine II, Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jan Pitha
    Affiliations
    Department of Internal Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Second Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic

    Laboratory for Atherosclerosis Research, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
    Search for articles by this author
  • Alena Krajcoviechova
    Affiliations
    Center for Cardiovascular Prevention, Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
    Search for articles by this author
  • Eva Kralikova
    Affiliations
    Center for Tobacco Dependence, Third Medical Department – Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic

    Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 18, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.039

      Highlights

      • There are gender differences in the prevalence and awareness of major risk factors.
      • Smoking and diabetes seem to be more harmful in women.
      • Subclinical organ damage in hypertension is more prevalent in women.
      • Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is more common in hypertensive women.
      • Women are underrepresented in large clinical trials.

      Abstract

      Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in women in developed countries. The traditional modifiable risk factors are able to explain the majority of CVD mortality. The aim of this review is to analyze gender-specific aspects of major conventional cardiovascular risk factors and to assess whether they have the same impact on CVD in women.
      Cigarette smoking remains the single largest preventable cause of cardiovascular morbidity and premature death worldwide. Women smoke less than men; however, smoking seems to be more harmful in women, particularly in oral contraceptive users.
      Obesity in the general population is more prevalent in women. Visceral adiposity is associated with insulin resistance and a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
      Life expectancy in female diabetic patients is shorter than in men with diabetes; women with diabetes are also at higher risk of developing cardiovascular events.
      Changes of main lipid parameters in women are frequently associated with their hormonal status and/or hormonal treatment.
      Hypertension is highly prevalent in post-menopausal women and carries a higher risk of developing left ventricular hypertrophy, which, together with a greater increase in vascular and myocardial stiffness, results in a higher incidence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and a higher risk of developing stroke. The risk of abdominal aortic rupture is substantially higher in women.
      In conclusion, smoking, diabetes and hypertension seem to be more harmful in women. Therefore, the question is whether there should not be lower thresholds for initiating drug treatment in women with diabetes and hypertension.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to International Journal of Cardiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wilkins E.
        • Wilson L.
        • Wickramasinghe K.
        • et al.
        European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics.
        European Heart Network, Brussels2017
        • Yusuf S.
        • Hawken S.
        • Ounpuu S.
        • et al.
        Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study.
        Lancet. 2004; 64: 937-952
        • Huxley R.R.
        • Woodward M.
        Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
        Lancet. 2011; 378: 1297-1305
        • Prescott E.
        • Osler M.
        • Hein H.O.
        • et al.
        Life expectancy in Danish women and men related to smoking habits: smoking may affect women more.
        J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 1998; 52: 131-132
        • Piepoli M.F.
        • Hoes A.W.
        • Agewall S.
        • et al.
        2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR).
        Eur. Heart J. 2016; 37: 2315-2381
        • Critchley J.
        • Capewell S.
        Smoking cessation for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2004; 1 (Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2:CD003041.)CD003041
        • Thun M.
        • Peto R.
        • Boreham J.
        • Lopez A.D.
        Stages of the cigarette epidemic on entering its second century.
        Tob. Control. 2012; 21: 96-101
        • Benowitz N.L.
        • Burbank A.D.
        Cardiovascular toxicity of nicotine: implications for electronic cigarette use.
        Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2016; 26: 515-523
        • Hering D.
        • Somers V.K.
        • Kara T.
        • et al.
        Heightened acute circulatory responses to smoking in women.
        Blood Press. 2008; 17: 141-146
        • Carpenter M.J.
        • Upadhyaya H.P.
        • LaRowe S.D.
        • Saladin M.E.
        • Brady K.T.
        Menstrual cycle phase effects on nicotine withdrawal and cigarette craving: a review.
        Nicotine Tob. Res. 2006; 8 (6627–6338)
        • Wilson P.W.
        • D'Agostino R.B.
        • Sullivan L.
        • Parise H.
        • Kannel W.B.
        Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: the Framingham experience.
        Arch. Intern. Med. 2002; 162: 1867-1872
        • Garawi F.
        • Devries K.
        • Thorogood N.
        • Uauy R.
        Global differences between women and men in the prevalence of obesity: is there an association with gender inequality?.
        Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014; 68: 1101-1106
        • Meyer M.R.
        • Clegg D.J.
        • Prossnitz E.R.
        • Barton M.
        Obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes: sex differences and role of oestrogen receptors.
        Acta Physiol (Oxford). 2011; 203: 259-269
        • Valencak T.G.
        • Osterrieder A.
        • Schulz T.J.
        Sex matters: the effects of biological sex on adipose tissue biology and energy metabolism.
        Redox Biol. 2017; 12: 806-813
        • De Simone G.
        • Devereux R.B.
        • Chinali M.
        • et al.
        Sex differences in obesity-related changes in left ventricular morphology: the strong heart study.
        J. Hypertens. 2011; 29: 1431-1438
        • Halland H.
        • Lønnebakken M.T.
        • Pristaj N.
        • et al.
        Sex differences in subclinical cardiac disease in overweight and obesity (the FATCOR study).
        Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2018; 28: 1054-1060
        • Lavie C.J.
        • Pandey A.
        • Lau D.H.
        • Alpert M.A.
        • Sanders P.
        Obesity and atrial fibrillation prevalence, pathogenesis, and prognosis: effects of weight loss and exercise.
        J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017; 70: 2022-2035
        • Wong C.X.
        • Sun M.T.
        • Odutayo A.
        • et al.
        Associations of epicardial, abdominal, and overall adiposity with atrial fibrillation.
        Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol. 2016; 9 (pii: e004378)
        • Yumuk V.
        • Tsigos C.
        • Fried M.
        • et al.
        European guidelines for obesity management in adults.
        Obes. Facts. 2015; 8: 402-424
        • Tronieri J.S.
        • Wurst C.M.
        • Pearl R.L.
        • Allison K.C.
        Sex differences in obesity and mental health.
        Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2017; 19: 29
        • Caudwell P.
        • Gibbons C.
        • Finlayson G.
        • et al.
        Exercise and weight loss: no sex differences in body weight response to exercise.
        Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2014; 42: 92-101
        • Di Angelantonio E.
        • Kaptoge S.
        • et al.
        • Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration
        Association of cardiometabolic multimorbidity with mortality.
        JAMA. 2015; 314: 52-60
        • Tenzer-Iglesias P.
        Type 2 diabetes mellitus in women.
        J. Fam. Pract. 2014; 63: S21-S26
        • Bellamy L.
        • Casas J.P.
        • Hingorani A.D.
        • Williams D.
        Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Lancet. 2009; 373: 1773-1779
        • Hjellvik V.
        • Sakshaug S.
        • Strøm H.
        Body mass index, triglycerides, glucose, and blood pressure as predictors of type 2 diabetes in a middle-aged Norwegian cohort of men and women.
        Clin. Epidemiol. 2012; 4: 213-224
        • Djindjic N.
        • Jovanovic J.
        • Djindjic B.
        • Jovanovic B.
        • Jovanovic J.J.
        Associations between the occupational stress index and hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and lipid disorders in middle-aged men and women.
        Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2012; 56: 1051-1062
        • Meisinger C.
        • Thorand B.
        • Schneider A.
        • et al.
        Sex differences in risk factors for incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: the MONICA Augsburg cohort study.
        Arch. Intern. Med. 2002; 162: 82-89
        • Thorand B.
        • Baumert J.
        • Kolb H.
        • et al.
        Sex differences in the prediction of type 2 diabetes by inflammatory markers: results from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg case-cohort study, 1984-2002.
        Diabetes Care. 2007; 30: 854-860
        • Donahue R.P.
        • Rejman K.
        • Rafalson L.B.
        • Dmochowski J.
        • Stranges S.
        • Trevisan M.
        Sex differences in endothelial function markers before conversion to pre-diabetes: does the clock start ticking earlier among women? The Western New York study.
        Diabetes Care. 2007; 30: 354-359
        • American Diabetes Association
        2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes–2018.
        Diabetes Care. 2018; 41: S13-S27
        • American Diabetes Association
        8. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes–2018.
        Diabetes Care. 2018; 41: S73-S85
        • Farzadfar F.
        • Finucane M.M.
        • Danaei G.
        • et al.
        For the Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Cholesterol), National, regional, and global trends in serum total cholesterol since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 321 country-years and 3.0 million participants.
        Lancet. 2011; 377: 578-586
        • Cannon C.P.
        • Blazing M.A.
        • Giugliano R.P.
        IMPROVE-IT investigators, ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 2015; 372: 2387-2397
        • Sabatine M.S.
        • Giugliano R.P.
        • Keech A.C.
        • et al.
        FOURIER steering committee and investigators, evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease.
        N. Engl. J. Med. 2017; 376: 1713-1722
        • Catapano A.L.
        • Graham I.
        • De Backer G.
        • et al.
        ESC scientific document group; 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias.
        Eur. Heart J. 2016; 37: 2999-3058
        • Taylor F.
        • Huffman M.D.
        • Macedo A.F.
        • et al.
        Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
        Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013; 1CD004816
        • Fulcher J.
        • O'Connell R.
        • Voysey M.
        • et al.
        • Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration
        Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials.
        Lancet. 2015; 385: 1397-1405
        • Costantine M.M.
        • Cleary K.
        • Hebert M.F.
        • et al.
        Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research Units Network, Safety and pharmacokinetics of pravastatin used for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
        Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 214 (720.e1–720, e17)
        • Rapsomaniki E.
        • Timmis A.
        • George J.
        • et al.
        Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1·25 million people.
        Lancet. 2014; 383: 1899-1911
      1. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.
        Lancet. 2018; 392: 1923-1994
        • Brown L.C.
        • Powell J.T.
        Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants.
        Ann. Surg. 1999; 230: 289-296
        • Shufelt C.L.
        • Bairey Merz C.N.
        Contraceptive hormone use and cardiovascular disease.
        J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009; 53: 221-231
        • Bellamy L.
        • Casas J.P.
        • Hingorani A.D.
        • Williams J.D.
        Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BMJ. 2007; 335: 974
        • Regitz-Zagrosek V.
        • Roos-Hesselink J.W.
        • Bauersachs J.
        • et al.
        ESC scientific document group, 2018 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy.
        Eur. Heart J. 2018; 39: 3165-3241
        • Coylewright M.
        • Reckelhoff J.F.
        • Ouyang P.
        Menopause and hypertension: an age-old debate.
        Hypertension. 2008; 51: 952-959
        • Gerdts E.
        • Izzo R.
        • Mancusi C.
        • et al.
        Left ventricular hypertrophy offsets the sex difference in cardiovascular risk (the Campania salute network).
        Int. J. Cardiol. 2018; 258: 257-261
        • Turnbull F.
        • Woodward M.
        • Neal B.
        • et al.
        Blood pressure lowering treatment Trialists' collaboration, do men and women respond differently to blood pressure-lowering treatment? Results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials.
        Eur. Heart J. 2008; 29: 2669-2680
        • Brewster D.C.
        • Cronenwett J.L.
        • Hallett Jr., J.W.
        • et al.
        Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery, Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery.
        J. Vasc. Surg. 2003; 37: 1106-1117